Army unit working to get blind Iraqi girl eye treatment

“We’ve taken a real vested interest in the people here,” Kendrick said. “We empathize with the people.

Army unit working to get blind Iraqi girl eye treatment
Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Soldiers from the 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment are working to help a young girl in Iraq go beyond having a mental picture of her father to actually seeing him with her eyes.

Noor Taha Najee has been blind since birth, the result of a condition caused by poorly developed corneas. Though the condition can be corrected with surgery, the procedure isn’t available to the family, which lives near Kalsu, south of Baghdad.

The soldiers are working with a nongovernmental organization in Los Angeles to have the surgery done. “We’re on standby now, waiting for a doctor in L.A.,” said 1st Lt. Michael Kendrick, platoon leader of 2nd Platoon, Company D.
go here for the rest
http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=53760
Climbing up on my soapbox to get a better view. There are always these very heart warming stories of what some of the men and women serving in Iraq and Afghanistan are trying to do. We see so much of the horrifying images of the wounds they suffer from yet very little of what they have to go through. We see how human these warriors are in stories like this.

They want to help. They didn't go there to kill Iraqis. They were told they were going there to free them from Saddam and find the WMD they were told were meant for us back here at home. That's what they cared about. Ever since the day Iraq was taken, they have been serving and dying and so have the people of Iraq. We still don't know why that was. Still the notion of going in for a good cause is what they had in mind. They still want to hang onto that. They still want to do some good there but they have nothing to do the good with. They can do great and wonderful things here and there, they can try to rebuild what gets blown up and they can try to make peace in a nation that every expert knew would fall apart the way it did. We can argue all we want about what supporting them really means but you would have to be a fool to believe they had any evil intent going there.

We need to see them as humans, fathers and mothers, sons and daughters, as much as possible if we are ever going to understand them when they come home and suffer wounds for their service. I get about as angry as anyone about all of this but it gets me even more upset to know when they come home wounded, there isn't enough room for all of them to be taken care of. I see them as humans, courageous humans born with the tendency to be heroic already in them. I see them as noble but within that they are still humans asked to do the abnormal. We send them into this kind of life altering experiences and then we are the first ones to complain when they come home changed by them instead of being ready to take care of them. What the hell is wrong with us? We still don't get it. I still haven't heard of any huge mail drop onto the steps of congress demanding we take care of them. I have yet to read a flood of editorials or special report followed by special report on how we don't. Aren't they worth it?

Pentagon gave Tim Ngo, wounded Iraq Vet, 10% solution

Linked from ICasualties.org

Eamon Coyne
Tim Ngo (center) suffered a serious head injury while serving in Iraq. The military recognizes him as only "10 percent" disabled, which makes him ineligible for continued military health care. Above, Ngo stands with his girlfriend, Ani Cerghizan (left), and his mother, Hong Wyberg.

Health Care
Injured Troops Struggle to Get Health Care
by Joseph Shapiro


“I don't fully think they were prepared for the length of time this war is going to last. They had no idea of how many injuries or the type of injuries that were going to come out of this.”

Hong Wyberg, Mother of Tim Ngo, who sustained a serious head injury in Iraq.

Mark Wilson
Gordon England, deputy secretary of defense, says there is no incentive for the Department of Defense to reduce disability ratings. "We try to treat people fairly and accurately," he said last week. Getty Images




“It's counterintuitive. Why are the number of disability retirees shrinking during wartime?”
Mark Parker, Retired Army Lieutenant Colonel




All Things Considered, April 20, 2007 · When service members are forced to leave the military by war injuries or illness, they face a complex system for getting health and disability benefits. Sometimes, health care gets cut off when new veterans find they need it most. Some retired soldiers and their families say they are worried that the Pentagon won't spend enough money to give the injured the care they deserve.

'10 Percent Disabled'

Tim Ngo almost died in a grenade attack in Iraq. He sustained a serious head injury; surgeons had to cut out part of his skull. At Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., he learned to walk and talk again.

When he got back home to Minnesota, he wore a white plastic helmet to protect the thinned-out patches of his skull. People on the street snickered, so Ngo's mother took a black marker and wrote on the helmet: U.S. ARMY, BACK FROM IRAQ. On this much, everyone agrees.

But here is the part that is in dispute: The Army says Tim Ngo is only 10 percent disabled.

"I was hoping I would get at least 50 or 60 or 70 percent," Ngo says. "But they said, 'Yeah, you're only going to get 10 percent'... And I was pretty outraged."

When a service member is retired for medical reasons, the military's disability rating makes a difference. If Ngo had been rated 30 percent disabled or higher, he would have gotten a monthly disability check instead of a small severance check. He also would have stayed in the military's health-care system.

Instead, Ngo enrolled with the Department of Veterans Affairs. Typically, there's a waiting period for the VA.

In October, while he was uninsured, Ngo had a seizure, caused by his war injury. He remembers being outside and blacking out; he fell to the ground on the driveway.

"My girlfriend was freaking out because she didn't know what to do," Ngo says. "She didn't know if I was going to die because I had hit the wrong side of my head."

An ambulance took Ngo to the nearest emergency room for treatment. It cost him $10,000. Ngo says that today, the bills for the incident are still unresolved.

Shrinking Numbers

Since that day, Ngo has gotten health coverage through the VA. Earlier this month, the VA said it would pick up his leftover bills from the emergency room.

The VA has been more generous than the Army all around. It rated Ngo as 100 percent disabled compared with the Army's 10 percent rating.

The VA gives him a monthly disability check, which helps with his finances; his head injury and post-traumatic stress disorder have prevented Ngo from holding on to even a simple job since he returned home.

Ngo's mother, Hong Wyberg, says the Army gives soldiers such as her son low disability ratings to save money.

"I don't fully think they were prepared for the length of time this war is going to last," Wyberg says. "They had no idea of how many injuries or the type of injuries that were going to come out of this."

Michael Parker retired from the Army in October, and he thinks Wyberg's suspicion is correct.

"The more I looked into it, I realized that this system does not have the soldier's back at all," says Parker.

Parker was a lieutenant colonel when he retired last year. Today, he has a disabling condition similar to rheumatoid arthritis. Parker was able to get the Pentagon's lifelong health coverage for himself and his family; he had been in the military long enough — for at least 20 years.

But Parker saw that a lot of other soldiers weren't as lucky, and it inspired him to become an advocate.

"I started posting questions and concerns and opinions on various blogs," he says, "and it just kind of mushroomed from there."

Parker started digging through Pentagon data, and the numbers he found shocked him. He learned that the Pentagon is giving fewer veterans disability benefits today than it was before the Iraq war — despite the fact that thousands of soldiers are leaving the military with serious injuries.

"It went from 102,000 and change in 2001... and now it's down to 89,500," says Parker. "It's counterintuitive. Why are the number of disability retirees shrinking during wartime?"

A 'Cost-Saving Device'?

Retired Army Lt. Gen. James Terry Scott heads a commission, set up by Congress, to study veterans' disability benefits. At a Senate hearing last week, Scott said that his commission had compared the way the Pentagon and the VA rated the same soldiers.

"The Department of Defense records were matched with VA records on 2.6 million veterans receiving disability compensation," Scott said. "Those rated zero, 10 or 20 percent [disabled] by the Department of Defense were rated in the 30 to 100 percent range by VA more than half the time."

In other words, troops often get small disability checks and no military health care when rated by the Pentagon's disability boards. But when they go to a VA board — with the same injuries — they get much more.

Scott said one reason is that the military's ratings determine whether a person is fit for duty, whereas the VA looks at all conditions that create health problems for a veteran. So the VA ends up rating more disabilities per retired service member.

But Scott said another reason may be that the Pentagon wants to keep down its costs.

"It is also apparent that the Department of Defense has a strong incentive to rate less than 30 percent, so that only severance pay is awarded," Scott said.

These numbers yielded some tough questions for Pentagon officials at the Senate hearing, such as Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England.

"How do you respond to [the] assertion [that] the Department of Defense reduces disability ratings as a cost-savings device?" asked Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK).

"I can tell you... there's no incentive to do that, senator," England replied. "I mean, maybe that's read into that. But I can tell you, we try to treat people fairly and accurately. And so there's certainly no incentive."

Pentagon officials conceded that the disability system doesn't work as well as it should. They admitted it is too bureaucratic and too often adversarial. They said they would listen to suggestions for change.

Navigating the System

But change in the future will come too late for many soldiers.

April Croft was serving in Afghanistan when she was diagnosed with leukemia. She was treated for a year at Walter Reed. The cancer seemed to go into remission and she was sent home.

"They told her that she was only eligible for a 10 percent rating with the illness of leukemia," says her husband, Mark Croft. "She was livid. She's actually contested that situation about three times already."

The Army never increased its 10 percent rating, but the VA rated her 100 percent disabled.

Croft spoke from his wife's room in a VA hospital in Seattle, where she recently underwent a bone-marrow transplant.

"The VA originally gave her 50 percent and upped it to 100 percent once... she got sicker," Mark Croft explains.

The VA provided the life-saving operation April Croft needed, but the low rating from the Army still mattered: The VA only covers veterans, not their families. It is the military health-care system that will insure an entire family — but only if the vet has a disability rating of 30 percent or more. April Croft has two young children, who are living with their grandparents in California.

Her kids eventually did get military health care — but only recently, after their mother married Mark, who is still in the Army. Mark and April wed in Reno in March. Afterward, he was given leave from the Army. Instead of taking off for a honeymoon, the newlywed couple drove to Seattle and checked into the hospital.

It's the kind of complicated arrangement that many veterans must make to navigate the military's complicated disability system.

Read the rest of Tim's story here

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89213921

More on Military Medical Care:
April 11, 2007Pentagon Neglected Walter Reed, Panel Says
March 20, 2007The Healing Waters Project
March 6, 2007Military Mental Health Care Under Scrutiny
March 6, 2007VA and Walter Reed Are Two Separate Systems
March 6, 2007Committee Says Scandal Goes Beyond Walter Reed
Feb. 24, 2007A Veteran's View of Conditions at Walter Reed
Feb. 22, 2007Army Probes Reports of Neglect at Walter Reed

You need to read the rest of his story and how things change in families. It isn't easy on them to recover and it sure isn't easy on the family.

Houston prepares for flood of PTSD and TBI veterans

March 30, 2008, 11:30PM
A healthier homecoming
Houston needs to prepare for flood of veterans with mental and brain disabilities


Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle


The converted Holiday Inn at 4640 Main Street is packed, but fulfilling its purpose. The nonprofit facility now houses 280 veterans with head injuries, mental illness or other combat-related wounds.

The only hitch: Most are Vietnam veterans. Houston so far has barely glimpsed the psychological harm suffered by thousands of soldiers soon to come home from Afghanistan and Iraq.

It's a certainty, though, that they will need services far beyond what Houston currently can give.

"We're basically busting at the seams, to tell you the truth, " said Tom Mitchell, director of the Main Street facility. "And it may be three, or four, or five years before (new) veterans start hitting the streets" because post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injuries unglued their lives.

In some ways, these newer veterans will benefit from lessons of the Vietnam War and, more recently, scandalous mistreatment at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

Doctors today are more familiar with PTSD. Its symptoms include anxiety, insomnia, substance abuse and depression. And the Walter Reed revelations goaded Congress into studying veterans' physical and psychological needs and better coordinating the Veterans Administration and Defense Department so wounded veterans can get treatment more easily.

Even so, both national and local mental health experts say programs aren't in place to handle the flood of homecoming soldiers who will be suffering PTSD and traumatic brain injury. It's estimated that 17 percent to 30 percent of soldiers will come home with PTSD alone.

Harris County, with its gross deficit in mental health care services for civilians, could be particularly hard hit. Already, about 70 percent of Houston's 10,000 homeless people suffer serious mental illness. Some 30 percent of those homeless are veterans, mostly from Vietnam.

The returning soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan could have even more severe problems. The new phenomenon of repeated, prolonged combat — two, three, even four tours of duty — intensifies traumatic stress disorders.

Houston will see a large number of these patients. One in 11 soldiers who are wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan is a Texan. And 25 percent of the state population is from the Houston-Galveston area.
go here for the rest
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/5660366.html

Phishing scam turns out to be an inside Army job

Phishing scam turns out to be an inside job

By Karen Jowers - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Apr 1, 2008 13:31:21 EDT

An Army “phishing” test backfired the day before April Fool’s Day after an Army command was discovered phishing amongst its own.

The Army Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation Command issued a press release at 4:12 p.m. Monday warning about a phishing e-mail scam.

The e-mail, which sported the Army’s official MWR logo, appeared to be an attempt to obtain personal information from soldiers by offering promises of free or discounted tickets to theme parks and attractions.

The press release said the Family and MWR Command was trying to find the owners of the Web site and the host of the domain.

Less than an hour later, the command issued another statement saying the phishers had been found — the Army’s own Network Enterprise Technology Command.

That command had notified MWR officials that it had been conducting a test of how soldiers respond to phishing scams — without letting anyone in the MWR command know about it.

Army MWR officials sent out a retraction 54 minutes after their phishing warning went out, saying they were “furious” that such a test had been conducted, using the MWR logo, without their knowledge or consent, and apologizing “for any inconvenience this might have caused.”

The phishing scam e-mail listed a Web link with an online registration form asking for a name, e-mail address, phone, city, state and ZIP code. The e-mail apparently went out across the service to soldiers’ Army e-mail accounts and to MWR professionals.

“I don’t think they were doing anything malicious,” said Laurie Pugh, spokeswoman for the Army Family and MWR Command. “They were just testing the system to protect our soldiers. We wish we had known in advance. But we know our system worked. We got the word out quickly.”
go here for the rest
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/04/military_phishingscam_040108w/

Richard Hernandez, Marine, Vietnam Vet just wanted to sleep

Vietnam vet looks back to battlefields

BY JAMES GILBERT
SUN STAFF WRITER



Some veterans who served in Vietnam wanted to put the war behind them as soon as they returned home from the fighting.

That's what Foothills resident Richard Hernandez, who served in the U.S. Marine Corps, said he did for nearly four decades.

But in the course of getting records to document his claim for greater disability benefits, he decided he wanted to know more about how his actions on the battlefield fit into the bigger picture of that war.

"I wanted to know what all I did while I was there. It was important to me," Hernandez said of the armed conflict he experienced. "It was a lot of muscle, sweat and blood. But you got used to it after awhile."

Hernandez, 59, grew up in Gonzalez, Calif., and joined the U.S. Marine Corps on March 6, 1968, at the age of 18. He did so, he said, so he could be more like his older brother, who had already enlisted and was wounded while serving in Vietnam.
go here for the rest
http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfAPR08/nf040108-2.htm

He went to the VA so that he could sleep. That's all he wanted. Imagine a lifetime of service, deaing with PTSD and that's all he wanted!